
Dear Charu…
I hope the tears you shed on watching Rehman being awarded those Oscar trophies might have dried out now. I too have come a long way away from the few drops I shed clandestinely on that Monday morning. We, such sentimental idiots, never run dearth of tears. Your review on ‘Naan Kadavul’ in ‘Uyirmmai’ is elaborate as usual. I wished I had seen those foreign movies whose names kept bulking along the review. Nevertheless they hardly hindered me in getting your standpoint on the movie. It’s an honest review even though you have gone overboard while deploying some prenominal phrases. The other day I was awed when going through an article by one Bharadwaj Rangan in ‘The New Indian Express’. He had stated that Ilayraja has struck form and has returned to his hey days in ‘Naan Kadavul’. When I went to watch the movie I could only find some faint traces of what Rangan had claimed. Ilayaraja is not at his best in ‘Naan Kadavul’ yet, Charu I would like to say that he is not that bad as you state him to be.
As the begging Amsavalli sings an old number it is not only jarring to hear the instruments in toe, it deprives those sequences of its reality too. It is one place where the Maestro could have had a second thought, though the tambourine in Amsavalli’s hands asks for something to go along with her singing. But Charu, all these years in our cinema, we have born, grew-up, kissed, made love, laughed, cried, plotted against each other, fought and died with some music playing in the backdrop. We have had our golden silences too. Though golden, how killing were the silences and how we grew restless and intolerable to it, and how we yearned for the suffocating silences to end and wanted a bit of a harmonium or a violin or a mridangam or a tabla to come to our rescue. When Shakespeare ends one of his plays as ‘The rest is silence’ the gloom that fills one’s heart is immeasurable and how one’s hands got itchy to scribble something in the next line to make it void. May be the Maestro has saved us from a heart-break by not ceding silence its due.
You have talked about a sequence in ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ where Rehman wisely has kept himself away from his instruments. The ‘Jai ho’ man is wise and he masters the instruments and he knows when to play them and most importantly when not to. Does wise men’s music make us wise? I listened to ‘Jai ho’ more than a few times and tried to extract something which made the Academy to tilt to his favour to hand him the Oscar, unfortunately I found my ears not so wise as of the jury and Rehman’s western masters- Danny Boyle and company.
Here we can talk about the man who doesn’t master the instruments but instills something into them; in return gets the soul-stirring stuff called music. Fortunately Ilayaraja is his own master. It is inevitable that unquestionable mastery goes with some questionable incongruity. Charu, I just want to put it that your Oscar man is a wise composer who can produce just music but the man of the masses is a faulty genius who devours you with his unbounded flow of eternal euphony.
I hope the tears you shed on watching Rehman being awarded those Oscar trophies might have dried out now. I too have come a long way away from the few drops I shed clandestinely on that Monday morning. We, such sentimental idiots, never run dearth of tears. Your review on ‘Naan Kadavul’ in ‘Uyirmmai’ is elaborate as usual. I wished I had seen those foreign movies whose names kept bulking along the review. Nevertheless they hardly hindered me in getting your standpoint on the movie. It’s an honest review even though you have gone overboard while deploying some prenominal phrases. The other day I was awed when going through an article by one Bharadwaj Rangan in ‘The New Indian Express’. He had stated that Ilayraja has struck form and has returned to his hey days in ‘Naan Kadavul’. When I went to watch the movie I could only find some faint traces of what Rangan had claimed. Ilayaraja is not at his best in ‘Naan Kadavul’ yet, Charu I would like to say that he is not that bad as you state him to be.
As the begging Amsavalli sings an old number it is not only jarring to hear the instruments in toe, it deprives those sequences of its reality too. It is one place where the Maestro could have had a second thought, though the tambourine in Amsavalli’s hands asks for something to go along with her singing. But Charu, all these years in our cinema, we have born, grew-up, kissed, made love, laughed, cried, plotted against each other, fought and died with some music playing in the backdrop. We have had our golden silences too. Though golden, how killing were the silences and how we grew restless and intolerable to it, and how we yearned for the suffocating silences to end and wanted a bit of a harmonium or a violin or a mridangam or a tabla to come to our rescue. When Shakespeare ends one of his plays as ‘The rest is silence’ the gloom that fills one’s heart is immeasurable and how one’s hands got itchy to scribble something in the next line to make it void. May be the Maestro has saved us from a heart-break by not ceding silence its due.
You have talked about a sequence in ‘Slumdog Millionaire’ where Rehman wisely has kept himself away from his instruments. The ‘Jai ho’ man is wise and he masters the instruments and he knows when to play them and most importantly when not to. Does wise men’s music make us wise? I listened to ‘Jai ho’ more than a few times and tried to extract something which made the Academy to tilt to his favour to hand him the Oscar, unfortunately I found my ears not so wise as of the jury and Rehman’s western masters- Danny Boyle and company.
Here we can talk about the man who doesn’t master the instruments but instills something into them; in return gets the soul-stirring stuff called music. Fortunately Ilayaraja is his own master. It is inevitable that unquestionable mastery goes with some questionable incongruity. Charu, I just want to put it that your Oscar man is a wise composer who can produce just music but the man of the masses is a faulty genius who devours you with his unbounded flow of eternal euphony.
6 comments:
தமிழிலேயே எழுதுங்கள்.உங்கள் பதிவை எந்த ஆங்கிலேயனும் வந்து படிக்கப்போவதில்லை,தமிழர்கள் தான் படிக்கப் போகிறார்கள்.ஆங்கிலத்தில் எழுதுவதன் மூலம் என்ன சாதிக்க முடியும் என்று எனக்குத் தெரியவில்லை..
அன்புடன்,
செந்தில்நாதன்.
Hi Senthil,
I differ from your opinion.
English is more or like looked upon as language and the author is probably profound in both the languages and he wishes to write in Tamil as well as in English. There are lot of dailies and weeklies in English are being circulated in India (in TN as well), do you think that English buy and read them. We find lot of English medium schools around, I don't see any foreigner going to these schools.
Let him write in a language that he is comfortable with and we shall enjoy reading them.
Regards,
Raajesh
நன்றி ராஜேஷ்..
அவர் எழுதிய விடயம் இளைய ராஜாவைப் பற்றி சாரு நிவேதிதா எழுதியதுக்குப் பதில் தான்.
ஆனால் சாரு கண்டிப்பாக தமிழில் தான் எழுதியிருப்பார்.அதற்கு பதில் மட்டும் ஆங்கிலத்தில் ஏன் எழுத வேண்டும்..?
இளையராஜா தமிழர்,சாருவும் தமிழர்,அசதாவும் தமிழர்,ராஜேசும் தமிழர்,செந்திலும் தமிழர் விவாதம் மட்டும் ஆங்கிலத்திலா?இதை விட மடத்தனம் உலகில் எங்காவது இருக்க முடியுமா?
ஆங்கில வழி பள்ளிகள்,ஆங்கில ஏடுகள் இவையெல்லாம் இருக்கின்றன என்பது சரிதான் ஆனால் ஒருவனின் மொழி தான் அவனது அடையாளம்.ஆங்கிலம் தான் அசதாவுக்கு வசதியான மொழி என்பதை என்னால் ஏற்றுக்கொள்ள முடியவில்லை.ஆங்கிலத்தில் எழுதினால் தான் அறிவாளி என்ற சில தமிழர்களின் மன நிலை கூட இதற்குக் காரணமாக இருக்கலாம்.வெள்ளையன் விட்டுச் சென்றாலும் நமக்கு அடிமைத்தனம் குறித்த உணர்வே இல்லாமல் இருக்கச் செய்துவிட்டுத்தான் சென்றிருக்கிறான்.
இது தான் அவனது வெற்றி.
அன்புடன்,
செந்தில்.
Hi Senthil,
Thanks.
Your point well noted.
But I think that any writer would be happy when someone appreciates his writing skills and profoundness in a language.
Here, Asadha writes in Tamil as well as in English. He is probably more interested in experimenting his skills in both languages. I don't think it is wrong.
I look at it purely as exhibiting his skills in multi languages than the other topics that you have identified.
Of course they are the long fought topics around, I don't deny.
If he probably knew any other language than English and Tamil, he would have tried it as well (I hope).
Let us appreciate him as well.
Regards,
Raajesh
Dear Asatha,
One who is a master of himself, is the true Master. Music is what feelings sound like....what colours feel like, and music is enough for lifetime but a lifetime is not enough for music. Qualitative is different from quantitative. Of course, A commanding composition steals the soul but a meaningful melody stirs the soul. stealing takes you away... but stirring vibrates. The vibration is Meditation....and vice versa. That which vibrates is the Yoga. Here, let us sit together and close our eyes, deeply inhale the soul of music and fill our minds with the peace of eternal music.
Thanks and best wishes,
Thara Ganesan
URL: tharaganesan.blogspot.com
Funny guy... Asatha... he seems to be too self centric, thinking that his views are going to sway the world, while it cannot even convince himself.
He is talking about the ARR being the slave of Western Masters, while his lofty English betrays a far too bigger 'Macaulayian' slavery. This is all the more so considering ARR's ability to make the western ear to listen to his 'Crescendos', while 'Illayaraja' could not even retain a single self respecting 'youngster' born after 1980 to listen to his 'rustic' tunes, which is just 'one' among the 'hundreds' of tunes the ARR has provided in terms of variety.
The most foolish contention is that of this 'Curd Rice Eater' (Thayir Sadam) being bewildered at the folly of 'Oscar' Judges, as he do not like 'Biryani' provided by ARR and that is a better 'Eternal Euphony' to the North American and European Ears.
To put it simply such people has one single grudge against ARR and that is his 'Conversion to Islam'.
Curiously, the same people talked ill of 'Illayaraja' considering him as an untouchable, when he took 'Tamil Cinema' by storm in the 80's.
This is not a malady restricted to 'Tamilnadu'. This malady is worldwide considering the way a few 'Racists' tend to downplay 'Cat stevens' when he converted to 'Islam' and become 'Yusuf Islam'.
Asatha should not think he is too brilliant that he can conceal his 'uncouth' 'Racist' ideology as it blares with the way he uses the terms 'Slavery', which in fact he is afflicted with in one form or the other.
It is quiet a wonder, that the way these people could 'strut' around with their 'stinking' ideological baggage.
Post a Comment